In a the most recent post on amazing_ink , there is a picture tattoo of a topless woman that has had little black ovals photoshopped over where her nipples would be. The owner of this tattoo is a male who is also topless in the picture. His nipple is clearly visible.
So, the lesson we learn is,
real male nipple = a-okay
drawing of female nipple = OMG WON"T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Oh, and the topless woman is really only the top of a woman, as she appears to have been torn in half. Her guts are hanging out, but thankfully just a bit of intestine and nothing too insanely graphic as no attempts have been made to cover them with photoshop's helpful black ovals.
Our society = all sorts of messed up.
(and won't someone please think of the children?)
(and also, why is Deepest Sender suddenly not inserting user/community links when I tell it to? I can't be expected to actually type the tags myself, can I? Oh, the humanity)
So, the lesson we learn is,
real male nipple = a-okay
drawing of female nipple = OMG WON"T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Oh, and the topless woman is really only the top of a woman, as she appears to have been torn in half. Her guts are hanging out, but thankfully just a bit of intestine and nothing too insanely graphic as no attempts have been made to cover them with photoshop's helpful black ovals.
Our society = all sorts of messed up.
(and won't someone please think of the children?)
(and also, why is Deepest Sender suddenly not inserting user/community links when I tell it to? I can't be expected to actually type the tags myself, can I? Oh, the humanity)

Comments
I have a friend who models for various photographers and she's done a few nudes - hers are never covered up when she does those because it's in the name of art, not pornography, and that's the way it should be I think.